6.27.25 – Campaign for Working Families

Four Big, Beautiful Wins for Trump and Our Nation”

By Gary Bauer

Excerpts from this article:

https://mailchi.mp/cwfpac.com/eodarchive-13952469?e=ecf1613633


TODAY IS A GREAT DAY! 


The conservative Trump majority on the Supreme Court held strong and gave us three big, beautiful wins. 


…Here’s a brief summary of each case.


#1 -- REINING IN ROGUE JUDGES
 

The biggest impediment to President Trump’s America First agenda has been left-wing rogue federal district court judges imposing NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS against virtually everything he was elected to do.


There are nearly 700 federal district court judges, and many of them have been acting like partisan hacks determined to overturn the 2024 election by judicial fiat.


In the first 100 days of his second term, federal district court judges issued 25 nationwide injunctions against Trump’s policies. 


Joe Biden faced 28 injunctions in his entire four-year term.


Clearly, left-wing rogue judges have been abusing their power as a political weapon against Donald Trump, blocking virtually every major policy initiative from the firing of federal employees to deporting illegal aliens.


Today, the Supreme Court put a stop to that in a case challenging the president’s executive order on birthright citizenship.


As the administration requested during oral arguments, the justices sidestepped settling the issue of birthright citizenship and instead focused mostly on the issue of nationwide injunctions. In a 6 to 3 ruling, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote:


“…federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch; they resolve cases and controversies consistent with the authority Congress has given them. When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too.”


Further underscoring her point, Barrett responded to Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent, writing, “We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.” BOOM!


My good friend, Justice Clarence Thomas, put it bluntly, “Today puts an end to the ‘increasingly common’ practice of federal courts issuing universal injunctions.”

 

#2 -- PARENTS AND CHILDREN WIN 


Another big win came in a case from
Maryland where left-wing politicians attempted to force LGBTQ indoctrination on young children in virtually every subject at school.


That was bad enough, but leftists on the Montgomery County School Board went even further by eliminating all “opt-out” options. 


Parents from a broad coalition of faith backgrounds sued the county, lost, and appealed all the way to the Supreme Court.


In a 6 to 3 opinion, the [Supreme Court] justices ruled that the Montgomery County School Board violated the rights of parents. 


Writing for the majority, Justice 
Samuel Alito declared:


“We have long recognized the rights of parents to direct ‘the religious upbringing’ of their children.. those rights are violated by government policies that substantially interfere with the religious development of children…


The Board’s introduction of the ‘LGBTQ+-inclusive’ storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt-outs, places an unconstitutional burden on the parents’ rights to the free exercise of their religion.


The Board should be ordered to notify them in advance whenever one of the books in question or any other similar book is to be used in any way and to allow them to have their children excused from that instruction.


In their dissent,
the three liberal justices [Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, and Justice Jackson] argued that Montgomery County schools were right inExposing students to the ‘message’ that LGBTQ people exist.” 


Justice Alito blasted the three dissenting Supremes by saying that “ignores the messages that the authors plainly intended to convey.”


These books are used to indoctrinate children even when the authors admit they are
 not meant for children.

 

#3A  -- PORNOGRAPHY FOR CHILDREN 


Today’s final Big Beautiful Win comes from the Lone Star State -- Texas. 


Texas legislators passed a commonsense law to protect children by requiring proof of age to access pornographic adult websites. 


With total disregard for the welfare of children,
the porn industry sued to overturn the law.


Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the court’s 6 to 3 majority, stated, The power to require age verification is within a State’s authority to prevent children from accessing sexually explicit content.


Of course it is! We require proof of age to buy alcohol, firearms, and cigarettes. 


It’s just common sense to do the same to prevent children from being exposed to something else that is harmful to them.


As Justice Thomas noted, Obscenity is no exception to the widespread practice of requiring proof of age to exercise age-restricted rights.


HOW TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE EXCEPTIONAL DAILY REPORTING OF CAMPAIGN FOR WORKING FAMILIES: 
https://www.cwfpac.com/contribute

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

#3B -- EXTRA BACKGROUND INFORMATION – FROM DONNA GARNER 


In 2023, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton successfully defended the Texas age verification law before the U. S. Supreme Court.  


The Texas law requires pornography companies to institute reasonable age-verification measures to safeguard children from obscene online material. 


As of 6.27.25, the Supreme Court has now ruled that Texas’ age verification requirement does not violate the First Amendment and will remain in effect. 


Companies violating the age verification requirements will be subject to fines of up to $10,000 per day, an additional $10,000 per day if the corporation illegally retains identifying information, and $250,000 if a child is exposed to pornographic content due to not properly verifying a user’s age.


#4 -- ANOTHER GREAT SUPREME COURT RULING ON 6.26.25 – FROM DONNA GARNER


On 6.26.25, the U.S. Supreme Court voted 6 – 3 with the majority agreeing that South Carolina may cut federal funding to Planned Parenthood even for non-abortion services.


States may remove Planned Parenthood from its Medicare roster.  


This means that Medicaid patients will no longer be reimbursed for “any qualified and willing provider,” and individual Medicaid patients cannot sue to enforce their right to pick a medical provider.


Anti-abortion taxpayers in South Carolina will no longer be forced to pay for providers who perform abortions. 

==================================

 

MEMBERS OF THE U. S. SUPREME COURT


MAJORITY

Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. 

Associate Justice Clarence Thomas

Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.

Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett

Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch

Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh

 

DISSENTERS

Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor

Associate Justice Elena Kagan

Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson

 

MORE INFORMATION

6.27.25 – TAG Press Release – “Attorney General Ken Paxton Successfully Defends Texas Law Requiring Age Verification for Pornography Sites at SCOTUS” -- https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-successfully-defends-texas-law-requiring-age-verification-pornography


6.18.25 -- “U.S. Supremes Rule 6 to 3 Against Gender Trans Treatments for Minors” -- From Donna Garner --  https://donnagarner.org/6-18-25-u-s-supremes-rule-6-to-3-against-trans-treatments-for-minors-from-donna-garner/


6.18.25 – “SCOTUS Rules on State Ban on Gender Transition ‘Treatments’ for Minors in Landmark Case” -- By Haley Chi-Sing, Breanne Deppisch – Fox News --
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/scotus-rules-state-ban-gender-transition-treatments-minors-landmark-case


6.18.25 – “Supreme Court Upholds Tennessee’s Ban on ‘Gender-Affirming Care’ for Minors” – by Sam Dorman – Epoch Times --
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/supreme-court-upholds-tennessees-ban-on-gender-affirming-care-for-minors-5867052?utm_source=RTNews&src_src=RTNews&utm_campaign=rtbreaking-2025-06-18-1&src_cmp=rtbreaking-2025-06-18-1&utm_medium=email&est=ToDOn0wkv1vzCfEeKLJ%2Fqs2965O8ypImg5e8t0mRaST9jR8%2FDn5dSfGqAPYVB5Z9FDM%3D