On 10.24.19, the story first surfaced about James Younger who was then seven years old (https://redstate.com/brandon_morse/2019/10/24/video-surfaces-trans-child-texas-custody-battle-telling-father-mother-tells-hes-girl-n118373 )

James Younger is the son of Jeff Younger and his ex-wife Anne Georgulas, who is a pediatrician and who may be using her own son’s case as a way to build up her “gender-affirming” medical practice.

Anne became fixated with the transgender movement; and by James’ third birthday, she thought he was a transgender girl. She began buying him dresses, hairbands, hairclips, and nail polish.

In 2019, the court in an 11 to 12 jury decision gave Anne sole managing conservatorship of James and of his twin brother Jude. Jeff, the daddy, was forced by law to call James “Luna” and to use feminine pronouns.

Jeff asserted that whenever James was with him, he both dressed and acted like a boy and violently refused to wear girls’ clothes. Jeff made a video to document this.

When James’ transition therapist asked him to pick a favorite name “Luna” or “James,” he picked “Luna” when his mom was present; and he picked “James” when his dad was present.

Family friends and the church pastor all stated that James acted like a normal boy.

The case was so strange and gained such public attention that Gov. Greg Abbott decided to send Child Protective Services to investigate the situation.

ENTER TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN PAXTON

On 2.21.22 (https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/ag-paxton-declares-so-called-sex-change-procedures-children-and-prescription-puberty-blockers-be ), Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton released a formal TAG opinion that concluded “performing certain ‘sex-change’ procedures on children, and prescribing puberty-blockers to them, is ‘child abuse’ under Texas law…the opinion concludes that certain procedures done on minors such as castration, fabrication of a ‘penis’ using tissue from other body parts, fabrication of a ‘vagina’ involving the removal of male sex organs, prescription of puberty-suppressors and infertility-inducers, and the like are all ‘abuse’ under section 261.001 of the Texas Family Code.”

TAG Paxton went on to say, “The ‘transition’ of James Younger— the biological male son of Jeff Younger — to a ‘female’ through puberty-blocking drugs, among other things, was ‘abuse’ under at least three definitions set out in the Family Code, and that DFPS [Texas Department of Family Protective Services], therefore, had an independent duty to investigate.”

For almost a year, Texas has begun investigating gender transition surgeries and pubery-blocking drugs as “child abuse” because they meet the definitions set by the Texas Penal Code.

ENTER THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT

On 5.21.22 (https://www.dailywire.com/news/texas-supreme-court-rules-child-gender-transitions-can-be-investigated-at-child-abuse ), the Texas Supreme Court ruled that those child-abuse investigations may continue but will not be compulsory for family protective agencies to investigate child gender transition as child abuse.

Then on 12.29.22 (https://dailycaller.com/2022/12/29/texas-supreme-court-jeffrey-younger-child-transgender/ ) and 12.28.22 (https://thetexan.news/texas-supreme-court-to-review-james-younger-custody-case-after-mother-took-children-to-california/ ), the Texas Supreme Court agreed to take up the case filed by Jeff Younger, the dad.

ENTER ANNE GEORGULAS
Anne Georgulas, the ex-wife, decided to take both James (the boy that she says is a girl) and his brother Jude to California. Because Anne treats James as if he were a girl and a new California law goes into effect today (Jan. 1, 2023) that could nullify Texas’ laws that prohibit sex change surgeries and hormonal treatments for children, the desperate dad filed a Motion for Emergency Stay of the California law. At this point in time, James (the son) has not had his penis cut off yet; and the dad Jeff is frantically trying to keep that from happening.

REALLY POOR DECISION BY MAJORITY OF TEXAS SUPREME COURT MEMBERS

Unfortunately, as of 12.31.22, the Texas Supreme Court (except for Justice John Devine who did not concur with the other Texas Supreme Court judges) denied the dad’s petition which means James is in great danger under the California system.

Supreme Court Justice Devine agreed with TAG Paxton’s Amicus letter in total and noted his dissent to the denial by the other Supreme Court Justices who were willing to turn their backs on James. He could easily be undergoing penis removal surgery right now!

The Justices (all except for Justice John Devine) justified their decision by saying that Jeff (the dad) already has a court order prohibiting Anne from putting James through those transgender procedures.

THE NAÏVE TEXAS SUPREME COURT JUDGES (EXCEPT FOR JUSTICE JOHN DEVINE)

MY QUESTIONS:

The Dallas County trial court of Texas clearly abused its discretion in permitting Jeff Younger’s ex-wife to remove the children from Texas particularly since there was ongoing litigation in Texas regarding the children’s well-being. How can Jeff ever regain the custody of his vulnerable children now that they are in California where the “new” law, that will probably ignore Texas’ anti-gender mutilation laws, is going into effect today on 1.1.23?

Anne is living in leftist-controlled California, is ardently dedicated to the LGBTQ+ agenda, is highly involved with influencing families to put their children through the tortuous gender-modification surgeries, and is undoubtedly reaping the financial rewards of hiding behind her pediatrician’s moniker. Should dad Jeff and the Texas Supreme Court justices assume that Anne will abide by the Texas court order?

Can this daddy count on his misdirected wife to follow the Texas laws now that she is safely ensconced in California which is one of the most indoctrinated LGBTQ+ states in the country?

Should the daddy have stood back and allowed his son to be mutilated irreversibly for life?

California also has another law (S. B. 107) that says “its courts can assert temporary, emergency jurisdiction over children who are unable to receive controversial medical interventions in other states.” What is to keep California from asserting its control over both Jeff Younger’s children and then mutilating them for life?

==========================

DOCUMENTS IN THIS CASE

12.31.22 -- THE NAÏVE, TEXAS SUPREME COURT’S ORDER – https://search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=a76e41e7-c665-46b7-9e68-dd8bfbaf7c15&coa=cossup&DT=DISPOSITION&MediaID=9c0349d6-4e25-4669-8d1e-c1e77855b7ad

12.29.22 – LETTER FILED BY TEXAS VALUES -- IN REG JEFF YOUNGER -- https://search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=22-1137&coa=cossup

=================================

GENDER MUTILATION BILLS ALREADY FILED FOR UPCOMING TEXAS LEGISLATIVE SESSION:

FILED ON 11.14.22 – H. B. 41 -- BY TEXAS HOUSE MEMBER STEVE TOTH: https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/Text.aspx?LegSess=88R&Bill=HB41

FILED ON 11.14.22 – H. B. 42 -- BY TEXAS HOUSE MEMBER BRYAN SLATON: https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/Text.aspx?LegSess=88R&Bill=HB42

FILED ON 11.14.22 -- H. B. 122 – BY TEXAS HOUSE MEMBER STEVE TOTH: https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=88R&Bill=HB122