10.20.22 – Lumen News

“CDC Vaccine Committee Votes To Add COVID Shots to Child and Adolescent Vaccine Schedule”
By Susan Berry, PhD

10.20.22 – “CDC Vaccine Committee Votes To Add COVID Shots to Child and Adolescent Vaccine Schedule” – by Susan Berry, PhD – Lumen News -- VIEW ARTICLE

A child getting an injection from someone else


The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted unanimously [today] Thursday (15-0) to recommend adding COVID shots to the routine child and adolescent vaccine schedule, making it likely many states and, therefore, school districts, could require children to get COVID shots to attend schools.

“[T]here’s certainly no clinical data” to support it,” Dr. Marty Makary, a professor at Johns Hopkins University, told Fox News Channel host Tucker Carlson about this unprecedented move:

{They’ve got data from eight mice on the Omicron vaccine in young people. And the child vaccine story is essentially a story of bypassing clinical data, which is why many of us are asking why even have an FDA, why do we even do clinical trials right now. We’ve got Pharma, saying, Hey, we did a study, we’re going to give you the top line of the press release, we’re going to call the White House and the White House then calls the FDA and the CDC and tells them to get in line – they bought 170 million doses of this new Omicron vaccine.}

“There has never been a vaccine added to the child immunization schedule without solid clinical evidence that it reduces disease significantly in the community,” Makary continued. “The COVID vaccine in children will be the first – it will be added with no clinical data.”

He [Makary, John Hopkins professor] explained many medical and public health professionals have asked to see the data that would support placing COVID shots on the children’s vaccine schedule:

{We’re basically told stop asking questions. Dr. Jha, who’s the Chief COVID advisor at the White House has said he has seen the data, but it’s not public information. What are they hiding? Why can’t we see this information? Instead, we’re basically seeing this intense paternalism to really just do what we say and stop asking questions.}

Makary referred to the CDC’s ACIP as a “kangaroo court.”

“You have to be an official card-carrying vaccine fanatic to be on that committee,” he asserted. “If you’re not, then basically they’re not going to accept people who think that some vaccines are important and others lack the evidence to support broad distribution.”

The Johns Hopkins professor cited date from outside the U.S. that provides evidence the COVID shots are unsafe.

“Remember, one in 5,000 vaccine doses results in a severe adverse event, according to data from overseas, from Germany, because we don’t find that research in the U.S.,” he said. “And, in Israel, they took 283 people who got myocarditis from the vaccine, one of them died, two were in the ICU. So, if thousands of people are going to get myocarditis from this indiscriminate vaccination in young, healthy people, we’re going to see some unintended harm, and my concern is that some schools may blindly accept this.”

Makary said if the COVID shots are placed on the routine vaccine schedule, “it’ll be up to states, and that’s where, I think, parents have a right to say, let’s see some clinical data before we force this as a requirement for school.”

…Children’s Health Defense shared what most agree is the likely scenario, that it is “up to each state to decide on mandates” for vaccine schedules, “but most states decide based on your vote.”

Los Angeles-based psychiatrist Dr. Mark McDonald, author of United States of Fear: How America Fell Victim to a Mass Delusional Psychosis and Freedom From Fear: A 12 Step Guide to Personal and National Recovery, explained at his Substack column Dissident MD how the move to get COVID shots on the child and adolescent vaccine schedule greatly benefits government-sponsored Big Pharma:

{[T]he clear motivation for launching the unprecedented, concerted attack in 2020 on physicians who advocated for early treatment for those infected with the Chinese Wuhan virus was to defend the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) protection for the development and distribution of a vaccine, something that is not possible when an existing medical treatment is available. Now that the “emergency” is coming to a close, as even President Biden acknowledged last month, the “vaccine” rollout will also necessarily be ended. Under current federal law, it cannot continue.}

However, it can continue, McDonald said, “under one condition.”

“The CDC adds the ‘vaccine’ to the pediatric immunization schedule,” he explained. “By doing this, the mRNA medical therapeutics can continue to be manufactured and sold.”

“More importantly, the liability protections for the manufacturers can then be extended beyond the EUA umbrella, because the shots are now part of the list of required immunizations for children to attend school,” McDonald added. “That means that no one can sue Pfizer or Moderna for injury or death, even if children are forced to get the shot to go to school.”

Dr. Robert Malone, who has opposed the use of his mRNA technology in the COVID shots, explained further at his Substack column what the ACIP vote means:

{Mainstream media is pretending that states determine what vaccines are used, but the truth is that pediatricians use the CDC schedule and state public health officials use this schedule. State public health systems use the schedule to determine which vaccines to require for children to enter schools. Yes, some states have more stringent requirements than others. Some states allow for “opt-outs,” but in the end, most states follow the CDC guidelines. The ACIP functionally establishes “standard of care” in this area.}

Malone cited Rich Baris, “The People’s Pundit,” who posted his survey results in summer and fall of 2021 that found about 60 percent of parents of school-age children opposed the idea of adding COVID shots to the list of required immunizations to attend schools.

Baris predicts a “homeschool boom.”

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) vowed his state would not be mandating COVID shots for young children as long as he is governor.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) noted that, with the ACIP’s unanimous vote, “mRNA is now a government sponsored religion.”

And Liberty Counsel Chairman Mat Staver, whose law firm has represented many who have battled the COVID vaccine mandates in the courts, stressed in response to the CDC committee’s vote that “[e]very state must reject this CDC mandate for children immediately.”

“Even the CDC’s own data reveals that these COVID shots are harming children,” he observed. “Pharmaceutical companies merely see children as a budget item to increase their bottom line and they continue to ignore the serious adverse events and deaths caused by these experimental shots.”