4.4.25
"Dr. Peter Marks: Guilty of Helping To Create COVID Hoax"
From Donna Garner
The Trump administration has recently cut 5,200 grants divvied out by USAID.
One of these cuts was the Gavi Vaccine Alliance that just lost $1.7 billion.
Gavi worked closely with WHO and WEF to perpetuate the COVID vaccine hoax.
Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the most published cardiologists ever in America, has called the COVID lies "the greatest crime against humanity in history."
TO SEE WHAT WE KNEW AND WHEN WE KNEW IT, PLEASE GO TO MY FREE-FOR-THE-TAKING WEBSITE -- DONNAGARNER.ORG -- AND CHOOSE THE COVID CATEGORY WHERE HUNDREDS OF ARTICLES ARE POSTED BY THE DATE OF PUBLICATION.
ONE OF THE MOST SIGNIFICANT IS:
6.19.24 -- “COVID and Its Pack of Lies: My Story” -- (STARTING IN NOV. 2019) -- By Donna Garner --https://donnagarner.org/6-19-24-covid-and-its-pack-of-lies-my-story-by-donna-garner/
ROLE OF DR. PETER MARKS IN PUSHING THE JABS ON CHILDREN
Dr. Peter Marks was the director for FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). His job was to help regulate vaccines, and he approved and helped to roll out the COVID shots (a mRNA product).
Dr. Marks was one of the main architects that made sure no long-term safety studies were required for the COVID jabs.
He is responsible for pushing the COVID jabs for children and infants.
Dr. Marks without randomized data regarding clinical outcomes repeatedly approved COVID boosters for kids as young as 6 months.
Alarming statement from Dr. Mary Talley Bowden on 4.2.25:
• The CDC reports that 9 million American children have received the latest version of the COVID shots with 12% of US children injected.
Dr. Marks fell right in line with Biden's CDCs advisory panel in Sept. 2023 when they recommended that children 6 months and older should get the updated mRNA COVID shot each year from Moderna or Pfizer/BioNTech.
…Dr. Marks echoed the narrative that the Biden White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha publicized: "COVID is a far greater threat to kids than flu is... It's just your annual COVID shot at this point."
DEBUNKED COVID STUDY
The problem is that their position was based on a study by Harvard Medical School instructor Jeremy Faust.
That study, however, had already been debunked by the Trump-appointed and now-confirmed National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Jay Bhattacharya, M.D.
"Jha’s claim amounted to 'scare-mongering.'”
He also, without randomized data, approved these COVID boosters for individuals who recently had had COVID.
Jeff Childers has said that Dr. Marks is the "FDA's version of Dr. Fauci."
Jeff Childers is the practicing attorney who, early on began helping those wrongly charged by the Biden administration but who were trying to get the truth out to the world about the COVID jabs.
DR. MARKS GONE NOW FROM FDA
When Dr. Marks basically got fired by RFK, Jr. on 3.28.25, Marks came out with a public letter full of totally false accusations against Pres. Trump and RFK, Jr.
The good news is that along with Dr. Marks being gone from the FDA, the HHS is planning to lay off 10,000 workers, reducing bureaucracy and redundancies within the sprawling health agency.
STATEMENT FROM RFK, JR. -- NEW HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SECT. -- “This overhaul will be a win-win for taxpayers and for those that HHS serves. That’s the entire American public, because our goal is to Make America Healthy Again.”
==========================
Excerpts from the following article:
3.30.25 --"Peter Marks' FDA Legacy: False Positives Killed Untold Numbers of People -- Marks Was Warned" -- by James Lyons-Weiler
We saw his decisions. We raised concerns, issued warnings, and watched them go unheeded.
Dr. Peter Marks answered not to science but to those who saw objectivity as optional. The tone-deafness remains obvious.
Dr. Peter Marks, former director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), resigned on March 28, 2025…
Marks' tenure was marked by significant controversies, particularly concerning the approval and oversight of COVID-19 diagnostics and vaccines.
THE PCR CATASTROPHE: FALSE POSITIVES, FEAR, AND FATAL PROTOCOLS
Under Dr. Marks' leadership, the FDA authorized the widespread use of RT-PCR tests for COVID-19 diagnosis.
Concerns arose regarding the specificity and the potential for false-positive results, especially in low-prevalence settings [places where few patients were tested].
Marks oversaw the deployment of high-cycle RT-PCR testing without adequate controls or interpretive guidance.
To this day, the public largely confuses False Positive Rate (FPR) with False Discovery Rate (FDR) — a distinction crucial to understanding the magnitude of harm.
False Positive Rate (FPR) is the proportion of truly negative tested samples that test positive (usually low).
The False Discovery Rate (FDR) is the proportion of positive results that are false.
In low-prevalence settings, even a highly specific test with low FPR can yield an FDR exceeding 50%, meaning that most positive test results are wrong.
[With a nasopharyngeal swab, a lab can use a sample of mucus from a person's nose to look for common infections such as the flu or COVID.]
The COVID-19 PCR [polymerase chain reaction] is used to see whether a person has COVID-19.
What is a COVID-19 PCR test?
Scientists use PCR to make copies of the DNA (amplification) that was in the original sample. [Definition of "Amplification" -- a usually massive replication of genetic material and especially of a gene or DNA sequence.]
By amplifying with PCR, labs can better analyze the DNA that was in the original sample.
PCR is used to determine if genetic material (RNA) of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID) is present.
[Generally, if a positive COVID PCR test result comes back with the word "detected," it means that either the person has COVID or has recently recovered from it.]
[If the COVID PCR test result comes back with the words "not detected," it means that the person probably did not have COVID at the time the nasal swab was done. However, it could also mean that the person has not yet exhibited the COVID symptoms.]
AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED
By spring 2020, when COVID-19 prevalence was low in most of the country, mass PCR testing at 35–40 cycle thresholds (Ct) created an illusion of widespread infection.
[The PCR test detects portions of viral RNA.
The COVID/PCR test result will continue to be positive long after the virus is no longer contagious.
A cell culture is a much better way to check for COVID viruses; but doing a cell culture takes a long time before getting the results; it is expensive; and it is not readily available in most hospitals.
The PCR test result will normally come back showing the cycle threshold (Ct) which indicates the number of cycles of amplification that is needed until a positive result is obtained.
If it takes more and more cycles to get a positive result, then that shows there is a smaller quantity of the COVID viruses.
A person will get back COVID results from the PCR test that indicate one of the following:
Negative -- no COVID virus detected -- Ct above 40
Positive -- all of the genes tested detected COVID -- Ct up to 40
Borderline Positive - Ct values usually between 35 and 40]
EVEN THOUGH MOST OF THE COUNTRY TESTED Ct 35 TO 40 -- DR. MARKS INSISTED U. S. BE LOCKED DOWN
The consequence? Entire hospitals locked down, patients were isolated unnecessarily, and fear permeated every layer of society.
People died alone.
Cancer screenings were missed.
Suicides climbed.
Lockdowns shattered lives and economies…
There has been no accountability for the FDA’s failure to issue clear guidance on Ct thresholds, viral culture correlation, or proper confirmatory testing.
The FDA continued to green-light high-Ct PCR tests under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), even after peer-reviewed studies showed the test was detecting non-viable viral fragments long after infectiousness ended.
…Furthermore, FDA never issued warnings to doctors implementing an untested, unproven protocol that restricted options for patients seeking to reduce the severity of their symptoms.
Patients were told to go home and stay home for ten days, and then seek care if they were sick enough to require emergency care.
Where were the randomized clinical trials backing that decision?
Where was Marks’ outrage when promising repurposed drugs and over-the-counter treatments were being bashed, including by his own agency?
Remember ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine? We do.
FAUCI'S HENRY FORD HOSPITAL STUDY DEBACLE
When Dr. Anthony Fauci publicly mischaracterized the results of a July 2020 observational study from Henry Ford Hospital — claiming it showed a “clear-cut, significant” one-quarter drop in COVID-19 mortality — Dr. Peter Marks said nothing.
The study, published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases, examined the use of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients but lacked randomization and failed to control for confounding variables such as timing, comorbidities, and concurrent steroid use…
Dr. Marks, as head of the FDA’s biologics division, had the scientific and ethical responsibility to step in and clarify the limitations of the evidence, especially given the politicization and polarization surrounding treatment protocols.
He never did.
His silence permitted a distorted narrative to calcify — one that shut down open scientific inquiry, vilified physicians who reported success with early treatment regimens, and ultimately contributed to the rigid adherence to “hospital protocols” that often delayed care until it was too late.
In failing to speak up, Marks allowed policy to outrun science, and for that, the consequences were both medical and moral.
THE COVID-19 VACCINE PROGRAM: FROM PROMISE TO REVERSAL
Under Dr. Marks' leadership, the FDA expedited the approval of COVID-19 vaccines through Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs)… subsequent studies revealed concerns:
- Waning Immunity and Breakthrough Infections: Research and the public’s direct experience indicated that vaccine effectiveness decreased rapidly over time, leading to an increased incidence of breakthrough infections…
- Negative Efficacy: Some studies reported instances where vaccinated individuals exhibited higher infection rates compared to the unvaccinated, suggesting potential negative vaccine effectiveness.
- Adverse Events: Reports of myocarditis, particularly among younger males, raised safety concerns. Additionally, issues such as thrombotic events and menstrual irregularities were documented.
TRANSPARENCY AND PUBLIC TRUST
…Throughout his tenure, dissenting experts were sidelined. Transparency was a talking point, not a principle.
Public confidence was treated as a messaging problem, not a data problem.
When confronted with criticism, Dr. Marks' default response was to accuse others of spreading misinformation — even when the concerns were based on FDA's own data.
THE DAMAGE BY MARKS IS DONE, BUT THE RECKONING IS JUST BEGINNING
Marks misled the public on Paxlovid and boosters…
He helped push unethical mandates.
The controversies surrounding diagnostic testing accuracy, vaccine efficacy, safety, shortcuts to fast-tracking unsafe drug underscore the challenges of balancing swift action with rigorous scientific evaluation…
History will not be written by resignation letters.
It will be written by the consequences — and those consequences are now undeniable.
SOURCES USED IN THIS ARTICLE
3.31.25 -- Jeff Childers -- C&C News https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/bugging-out-monday-march-31-2025
3.30.25 – “Top Vaccine Official Claims ‘Misinformation’ and ‘Lies’ as Disruptors Trump and RFK, Jr. Change the Status Quo” – By Dr. Susan Berry, Ph.D -- https://lumennews14.substack.com/p/top-vaccine-official-claims-misinformation?utm_campaign=email-half-post&r=3uxvo&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
3.30.25 -- "Popular Rationalism: A Postmortem on Peter Marks’ FDA Legacy: False Positives Killed Untold Numbers of People — and Marks Was Warned" -- by James Lyons Weiler -- The Post and Email" -- https://www.thepostemail.com/2025/03/30/a-postmortem-on-peter-marks-fda-legacy-false-positives-killed-untold-numbers-of-people-and-marks-was-warned/
4.3.25 -- "Dr. Mary Talley Bowden: How Vaccines Got Politicized and the Medical Industry Lost All Credibility" -- Tucker Carlson Podcast https://podmarized.com/episodes/tucker-carlson-podcast/dr-mary-talley-bowden-how-vaccines-got-politicized-and-the-medical-industry-lost-all-credibility
4.3.25 -- "During Tucker Carlson Interview, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden Drops Bombshells About Children Being Permanently Damaged by mRNA Jabs" -- by Lance D. Johnson - Newstarget -- https://www.newstarget.com/2025-04-03-children-subjected-to-destructive-mrna-vaccines-still.html